Re: Fixing the definition of the smime-type parameter by creating a registry
Paul Hoffman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime,gmane.ietf.saag |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:19 AM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote: > In the handling of draft-ietf-pkix-est, it came up that there really > ought to be a registry for values of the "smime-type" content-type > parameter. Sean and I discussed it, and I put together a quick > document (see below) to create the registry and do the magic. We > should have a brief discussion of it here before Sean AD-sponsors it > and sends it out for last call. > > In particular, we decided to propose "RFC Required" for the > registration policy. Is that the right policy? Does anyone have > other comments about the registry or the document? > > Please, a few reviews and comments will be needed before we can > proceed. And it' short. So have at it. The idea of having a registry seems fine, and "RFC Required" seems fine. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime