Re: eContentType for detached signatures
Russ Housley <[email protected]> Fri, 2 May 2014 11:01:06 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul: >> Your last point is incorrect. There have been many I-D signatures that are correct using id-ct-asciiTextWithCRLF. There are software bugs, and they are being worked, but some of the signatures are valid. > > Are you saying there will be significant negative operational impact of replacing those signatures with new ones? Given the "some" in that last sentence, I'm not sure I can imagine the problems. New signatures need to be generated for the I-D where there was a canonicalization problem. The ones that did not have a canonicalization problem do not need new signatures. Russ _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime