Re: S/MIME publishing mailing list
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> Sun, 25 Jan 2015 03:42:25 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAF64D9D@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> writes: >The problem is getting the MUAs to care enough about S/MIME to add code that >would automatically respond to that message. MUA interest is zero, if not >negative. Yup, and that's exactly the problem. Actually it's possible to go back a step further and say that the MUA lack of interest is caused by user lack of interest. Outlook has had... well I don't want to call it good but at least OK [0] S/MIME support built into it for a decade or more, so there's encrypted email available on every (Windows) desktop, but when was the last time you heard someone say "I'd really like to send encrypted email but I can't because certificates"? It's been posited that email encryption has reached pretty close to all of the market segment that cares about it (which is, to pull a figure from thin air, 0.05% of email users), so there's no point in doing any more on it. If you want encryption badly enough then you fight with some PGP implementation until either something works or the pain gets too much and you decide you don't need it that badly anyway. Alternatively, if you're corporate you're ordered to use encryption and the IT staff come along and set things up for you and you use S/MIME via Outlook. Once a year you call the helpdesk when you get warnings about certificate expiry until someone comes and makes things work again (or maybe you just quietly turn it off so your email will work like it's supposed to). Having said that, it wouldn't hurt to have an informational RFC to document the convention of GETSMIME and GETPGP, so at least those MUAs who want to do it have some common reference point to go from. It's such a simple thing to implement (if you already have an MUA) that it seems a shame not to document the capability. Peter. [0] In the sense that making email crypto usable is hard and there's no evolutionary pressure (with associated budget) to make it less hard, so MS have done a reasonable job given the environmental constraints. _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime