Re: why you shouldn't even try to canonicalize local parts
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> 15 Mar 2016 19:28:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp,gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Another idea in the opposite direction:
>
> A local-part fix up might be to use RFC7508 encrypted headers to repair the
> FROM and SENDER email addresses to their canonical form.
If you mean the canonicalization rules in section 4.3, they're borrowed
from DKIM and only change white space. It also references RFC 5750 which
says that
Receiving agents MUST check that the address in the
From or Sender header of a mail message matches an Internet mail
address, if present, in the signer's certificate, if mail addresses
are present in the certificate.
but it doesn't say what "matches" means.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp