Re: Key lookup service via draft-bhjl-x509-srv-00
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> 24 Mar 2016 17:12:43 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime,gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> I'm sorry, this makes no sense. How is my MUA supposed to know about the >> key of someone from whom I have not yet received a message? Based on >> the arguments I've seen, the main point of a key lookup service is to enable >> opportunistic encryption on the first message. > > My MUA knows my key. Your MUA knows your key. All that's missing is a way to have my MUA talk to yours. Right. When you come up with a way for my MUA to fetch a key from your MUA when you have never sent me a message, let us know. In the meantime, I think you need a better argument against per-domain key stores than "I don't trust them." The people from DANE are determined to use per-domain stores, so it'd be a lot more useful to figure out how to minimize the suckage than to yet again stick our fingers in our ears and pretend we don't hear them. Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime