Re: Key lookup service via draft-bhjl-x509-srv-00

"John R Levine" <[email protected]> 24 Mar 2016 17:12:43 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smime,gmane.ietf.x509
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> I'm sorry, this makes no sense.  How is my MUA supposed to know about the
>> key of someone from whom I have not yet received a message?  Based on
>> the arguments I've seen, the main point of a key lookup service is to enable
>> opportunistic encryption on the first message.
>
> My MUA knows my key.  Your MUA knows your key.  All that's missing is a way to have my MUA talk to yours.

Right.  When you come up with a way for my MUA to fetch a key from your 
MUA when you have never sent me a message, let us know.

In the meantime, I think you need a better argument against per-domain key 
stores than "I don't trust them."  The people from DANE are determined to 
use per-domain stores, so it'd be a lot more useful to figure out how to 
minimize the suckage than to yet again stick our fingers in our ears and 
pretend we don't hear them.

Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime