Re: Message takeover attacks against S/MIME
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:23:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C3497C@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> |
Jim Schaad <[email protected]> writes: >The one change that might hit CMS is the ability to use PGP keys. It depends >on if we want to do this just for encryption or for both encryption and >signing. What would prevent you from using them right now? I've been using (or at least suppoting the use of) PGP keys for CMS for years, you just use the key ID instead of the (absent) issuerAndSerialNumber. The reason for the "supporting the use of" is that I don't think anyone actually cares about using PGP keys for CMS/SMIME. Is there any actual demand for it? Peter. _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime