Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2633 (5019)

Ok. Let's say that I'm new to IETF process. The feedback provided so far is
offensive.

Please suggest the proper way to annotate that there is an error in a
number of the documents hosted by IETF.

Clearly someone successfully ridiculed IETF once such that future standards
appropriately included "[sic]" wherever "referer" is used. It shouldn't be
hard to suggest to a submitter the correct way to do that today, decades
later.

On May 14, 2017 4:35 PM, "Jim Schaad" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The name chosen has absolutely no change of what is one the wire.   That
> means that this is at best editorial and is definitely not technical.
>
>
>
> This is only going to affect those people who decide to use autogenerated
> constant names from the ASN.1 file.  The suggested change would make for an
> invalid ASN.1 file so it not correct.  Changing this name at this point
> would be a hassle for any one doing auto generation and highlighting that
> this is not, in some sense, a word does not affect the standard in any way.
>
>
>
> This should be rejected.
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* smime [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Russ Housley
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 14, 2017 10:55 AM
> *To:* Josh Soref <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]>; Paul Hoffman <
> [email protected]>; Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>; IETF SMIME <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2633 (5019)
>
>
>
> It is the name that the author chose to use in the ASN.1.  If it was a
> typo, then it would have been changed in the subsequent update to the RFC.
>
>
>
> Russ
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 14, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Josh Soref <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> It isn't an abbreviation, other tokens are clearly longer such as
> signingCertificate and smimeEncryptCerts. It's likely that the errata
> applies to multiple RFCs.
>
>
>
> On May 14, 2017 1:15 PM, "Russ Housley" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I believe that this errata should be rejected.  The author used an
> abbreviation, and the same spelling is used in RFC 3851.
>
> Russ
>
>
> > On May 14, 2017, at 12:35 PM, RFC Errata System <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2633,
> > "S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5019
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Technical
> > Reported by: Josh Soref <[email protected]>
> >
> > Section: 5
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> > id-aa-encrypKeyPref OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {id-aa 11}
> >
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > id-aa-encrypKeyPref [sic] OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {id-aa 11}
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > encryp isn't a word, it's a typo. Unfortunately, like http's (rfc1945)
> referer [sic] before it, this is now part of the API.
> >
> > This error should be highlighted (as rfc2068 does for referer [sic]) so
> that people are aware that the natural spelling doesn't apply.
> >
> > If it's possible for a revised RFC to be published suggesting the
> correct spelling w/ a way for clients/servers to handle the old spelling,
> that would be nice, but based on precedent, that seems unlikely.
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC2633 (draft-ietf-smime-msg-08)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification
> > Publication Date    : June 1999
> > Author(s)           : B. Ramsdell, Ed.
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
> > Area                : Security
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > smime mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime