Re: RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullPath

Jim Schaad <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Nov 2017 11:08:17 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.smime
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Normally one would presume that the trust point is shared and thus can be
excluded from the path.  I do not believe that a problem would exist if a
reference to the trust point existed, as long as that did not constitute a
trust decision.

 

Jim

 

 

From: smime [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hajek, Juraj
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 3:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [smime] RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullPath

 

Hello,

 

we are not sure about the interpretation of the following sentence in
RFC3125 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3125/?include_text=1).

 

CertRefReq and CertInfoReq, p.9

References for full cert path up to a trust point required

 

Does it mean that  the trust point should be included or excluded in the
path?

 

Thank you very much.

 

Best regards,

 

Juraj Hájek

Project Manager

 

Ardaco, a.s.

_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime