Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2631 (5480)
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:43:03 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Russ Housley <[email protected]> writes: >Wow, this has gone a very long time without anyone noticing. As far as I can >tell, it have not resulted in any implementation errors. Has it resulted in any implementations? (That's a serious question. What actually uses X9.42 DH, rather than PKCS #3 DH? That is, I know that some standards reference that RFC, but what actually implements it and uses it in the real world?). Peter. _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime