Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5652 (6546)

This looks correct to me.  Please accept and approve.

Russ


> On Apr 15, 2021, at 2:18 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5652,
> "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6546
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 12.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>  -- Imports from Appendix B of this document
>           AttributeCertificateV1
>              FROM AttributeCertificateVersion1
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>  -- Imports from Section 12.2 of this document
>           AttributeCertificateV1
>              FROM AttributeCertificateVersion1
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The AttributeCertificateVersion1 is defined in section 12.2; there is no Appendix B in this document.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5652 (draft-ietf-smime-rfc3852bis-00)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
> Publication Date    : September 2009
> Author(s)           : R. Housley
> Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
> Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG