RE: Status of the WG

Hi Andy,

I didn't say we need to decide if it should be deployed for
configuration.
I said we need to decide if it should be deployed.=20

If so, then we should provide guidance as to how this can be done, and
provide the necessary standardization to make it reasonably easy to do
so.

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Bierman [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:37 AM
> To: Harrington, David
> Cc: Durham, David; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Sming (E-mail); Randy=20
> Bush (E-mail); [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Status of the WG
>=20
>=20
> At 12:23 AM 2/14/2003 -0500, Harrington, David wrote:
> >As I said, we really need to decide whether we believe=20
> SNMPv3 is worth the effort to help get it deployed. If not,=20
> we should declare it Historic, pick an alternative, and move on.=20
>=20
> It's not that simple.  I think SNMP will continue to be used for
> monitoring for a long time.   I don't see it making any progress
> in configuration management, but that's my opinion.  Other people
> may find it perfect for their needs.
>=20
>=20
> >dbh
>=20
> Andy
>=20
>=20