Re: Status of the WG

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
  post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
  message to <listname>[email protected] and ask to have the alternate
  address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
  automatically accepted. ]

>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:06:23 -0800, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> said:

Andy> The cost/benefit ratio for SMIv2.1 seems worthwhile.  The
Andy> need for HC data types has been known since (at least) 1992.
Andy> Mandatory maintenance of SMIv2 is something that should already
Andy> be done, so better late than never.

Regardless of whether or not SMIv3 goes forward, the effort to create
a SMIv2.1 would be well worth it.  I don't think it's a huge amount of
work to fix the known problems and thus shouldn't even detract
potential development of SMIv3 in the first place.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Network Associates Laboratories