RE: Minutes from the sming wg interim meeting, June6-8,2002 in W ashington DC

Randy Presuhn <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Sep 2002 08:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sming
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi -

> Message-ID: <[email protected]=
asys.com>
> From: "Harrington, David" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Steve Waldbusser'" <[email protected]>,
>         "David T. Perkins" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Minutes from the sming wg interim meeting, June6-8,2002 in=
  W
> 	ashington DC
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 06:03:39 -0400=20
...
> As SNMP is being more widely accepted, other standards bodies are creat=
ing
> their own mibs, and are not always following all the crappy little rule=
s we
> define. I have recently run into mibs from other organizations with 0
> sub-ids, so we need to be careful about relying on good OID-assignment
> behavior, and make sure the rationale behind any crappy little rules th=
at
> would affect this are clearly and prominently documented.
...

Indeed, what RFC 2578 does have to say about the matter:

7.10
...
|  Note that the final sub-identifier of any administratively assigned
|  name for an object shall be positive.  A zero-valued  final sub-
|  identifier is reserved for future use.
...
8.5
...
|  administratively assigned name.  In order to achieve compatibility
|  with SNMPv1 traps, both when converting SMIv1 information modules
|  to/from this SMI, and in the procedures employed by multi-lingual
|  systems and proxy forwarding applications, the next to last sub-
|  identifier in the name of any newly-defined notification must have
|  the value zero.

This taken together leads me to believe that *embedded*
zero sub-identifiers are currently perfectly legal.  The only
restriction on the use of zero is for the final sub-identifier
assigned in an OBJECT-TYPE.

Am I missing something?

 ------------------------------------------------------
 Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  SJC-1.3141
 [email protected]  2141 North First Street
 Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San Jos=81=E9, California 95131  USA
 ------------------------------------------------------
 My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
 ------------------------------------------------------