Re: SMIng consensus issues restated, call for consensus ends Septembe r 18, 2002

Frank Strauss <[email protected]> 18 Sep 2002 09:14:29 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sming
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!

I think we move in circles. The major point in which we have separate
opinions is that 

 - you clearly separate between existing MIBs (that cannot benefit
   from some new SMI-DS features when they are revised) and new MIBs,
   while

 - I prefer a change from which both cases can benefit, but with the
   disadvantage that the data structures at levels > 1 cannot be
   addressed explicitly.

Do you agree, Andy?

I would also really appreciate comments on my reservations from other
WG members.

 -frank