Re: Email explained from first principles

Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smtp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
John Levine writes:

> Mailing lists have been editing messages for 40 years, long before anyone
> ever thought of DKIM or DMARC.   It is a well known DMARC failure that it  
> doesn't work with mailing lists.

s/that it doesn't work with mailing lists//.

I'm struggling to identify some tangible value-added that DKIM/DMARC brings  
to the table.

Ostensibly, these signatures prove that the mail really comes from the  
domain it purported to come from.

Ok, that's cool, but what is the point?

I'm told that this is to block spam that forges others domains.

Splendid, but I can't help but notice that spam that makes it past my spam  
filters features a shiny signature more often than not.

Here's a small sample from today's batch. I've masked the domain to avoid  
triggering someone's OCD's spam filter:

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=[spam domain]
                [blah blah blah]
From: "Mail-Admin courier-mta.com" <mailer-daemon@[spam domain]>
To: [email protected]

And here's one more:

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=[spam domain]
        [blah blah blah]
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=[spam domain];
        [two for the price of one] 
Subject: Strange Liver-Hormone Helps You Burn Fat 20 Hoursa Day

It seems very obvious to me that DKIM/DMARC has been a complete failure,  
even ignoring mailing list-related breakage.

They had some initial success, when they were a novelty. That changed as  
soon as their implementations gained some foothold. Spam senders figured out  
that spam filters are whitelisting signed domains. Therefore, all they have  
to do is use their own domain, sign their spam, and they's whitelisted!

Pure comedy gold.

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Y5xo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.