Re: Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?
"John Levine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Organization | Taughannock Networks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It appears that John C Klensin <[email protected]> said: >The other reasons, and the more important ones, are completely >pragmatic. First, given the heavy dependencies of the SMTPUTF8 >documents on RFCs 5321 and 5322 and that the latter are being >revised, I think it would not be helpful to revises the SMTPUTF8 >documents until after we have finished with the revisions of the >base documents. .... Oh, absolutely. If it seemed like I wanted to revise 6531 right now, I don't. It was more about is it worth making a list of things we might want to revise later.