Re: the point of domain authentication
"John Levine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Organization | Taughannock Networks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It appears that Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]> said: >1) That public DNSBL usage are reasonably popular. Everyone from Microsoft >(Outlook/Office365) to various hosting providers (1and1/godaddy) to large >infrastructure providers (GTT) uses public DNSBLs. Of course. Big providers all have paid subscriptions that give then higher query rates and often extra data. >2) That their golden age was in the 1990s. These days they'll mostly block >an occasional spam, but the don't amount to more than a rounding error of >the massive crapton that's flying everywhere. Your mail must be very different from mine. The handful of DNSBLs I use block the majority of the incoming mail I get and from looking at the logs, the error rate is very low. Large mail providers use DNSLBLs as part of their scoring systems. I use a handful to do simple blocking that I trust not to overblock (Spamhaus, Invaluement) but large systems have a lot more complicated mail flows than we do. R's, John