Re: Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?

Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smtp
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Sat 05/Jun/2021 20:14:28 +0200 John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> (2) At the risk of being even more pragmatic about your "very
> pragmatic" proposal, I know of no way to make an authoritative
> change in a standards track RFC -- whether one word or a few
> paragraphs -- without generating an I-D, having it discussed in
> the community, going through IETF Last Call, and publishing a
> new RFC.


How about an erratum?


Best
Ale
--
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.