Re: Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto)
Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:46:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADyWQ+Hx6t0FPr6ZFQ2piD5KU7MJQwWgRO0zKGe_LvG+B5yocg@mail.gmail.com> |
I'm with Dave on the idea of being Experimental. I know that Delivered-To has been around for a long time, but I always thought having the email address and the time stamp on Delivered-To would reading headers a bit easier for this person. tim On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 1:10 PM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/5/2021 10:05 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > I think "Informational" is a much better fit. This would document the > > long established practice of using "Delivered-To:" for loop detection. > > > It isn't. As I suggested, the document qualifies under more than one of > the reasons. > > I left off a derivative point, which is that 'Experimental' is a signal > to the wider technical and operations community that comments are > sought. As they are, in this case. > > There seems to be an inordinate focus on the loop detection benefit, > while ignoring the handling trace audit use that was, frankly, the > original reason for developing the document. > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > > _______________________________________________ > ietf-smtp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp > _______________________________________________ ietf-smtp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp