Re: Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto)

Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:46:50 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smtp
Message-ID <CADyWQ+Hx6t0FPr6ZFQ2piD5KU7MJQwWgRO0zKGe_LvG+B5yocg@mail.gmail.com>
I'm with Dave on the idea of being Experimental.

I know that Delivered-To has been around for a long time, but I always
thought having the email address and the time stamp on Delivered-To would
reading headers a bit easier for this person.

tim


On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 1:10 PM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 8/5/2021 10:05 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > I think "Informational" is a much better fit.  This would document the
> > long established practice of using "Delivered-To:" for loop detection.
>
>
> It isn't.  As I suggested, the document qualifies under more than one of
> the reasons.
>
> I left off a derivative point, which is that 'Experimental' is a signal
> to the wider technical and operations community that comments are
> sought.  As they are, in this case.
>
> There seems to be an inordinate focus on the loop detection benefit,
> while ignoring the handling trace audit use that was, frankly, the
> original reason for developing the document.
>
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-smtp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
>

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp