Re: Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto)
"Valdis Klētnieks" <[email protected]> Fri, 06 Aug 2021 04:29:27 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <154316.1628238567@turing-police> |
On 05 Aug 2021 22:45:58 -0400, "John Levine" said: > It appears that Dave Crocker <[email protected]> said: > >that's one less thing to make this more complicated... > > If we have a mail corpus it'd be interesting to see how many Received headers have "for" clauses > and if they match up at all with Delivered-To. > > Probably not, the "for" clause was never very popular. Don't bet on that. :) For the very old corpus, there were a total of 214,585 Received: lines, of which 65,273 had a ' for ' clause. By comparison, out of some 31,000 emails I received during June of this year, there are 270,893 Received: lines, of which 23,253 have a ' for ' clause. A quick eyeball indicates that Postfix, Exim, and Google all do it for single-recipient deliveries (several representative examples): Received: from mail.nanog.org (mail.nanog.org. [50.31.151.76]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i17si14861524ioi.33.2021.05.31.22.31.45 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 31 May 2021 22:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1lnx2R-0000zE-LN for [email protected]; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 01:34:03 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA67C061574 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 31 May 2021 22:47:47 -0700 (PDT) On the other hand, there were only 2,962 Delivered-To: headers, with only 22 different values that weren't final-delivery on my laptop. _______________________________________________ ietf-smtp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 494 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJhDPLnAAoJEI0DS38y7CIcTVUIAI/xr6LrgjL+1MxWCGIEG5Zs O+IpTXpKQHsgJgGeOoTjQxlYjEu3zMm06e1e+wu+Fepp/HAyC2UU62tVh67LMqbX DSvFUq0pMLOI22I/eud46IYgwB0UwM3nS2SNWBtKC/LndZihOqpDXN8GvyWmo8TY qppwy/GIlFKGrePR+QGLFkj7IedEDAQHf68rYN8jqC6ztGXUE1rWO9r8G3ZzlnN1 7ArYqlcIHM2CoUKcSot0ZemaQ3w2b1iDnCK3QTAFPJbEULXrtHC+T/piS6O2PT1d f7cPhyd423UIxNQWdPvvo+btoZWWYeHDjZfG9ThUSH89KiEZ6UnVRzHt9oBqWE8= =EVWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----