Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto

Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]> Sat, 07 Aug 2021 06:35:23 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smtp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Francesco Gennai writes:

> Following the discussion, I see that the delivery-to is currently used
> (in many cases) to loop detection.
> In such cases it could contain an email address, a token, etc..
> I suspect that at the top of the problems discussed here there is a
> conflict in the header name (deliverd-to:), between the current use
> and the draft.
> I would say that "delivered-to:" is not the best name for the current
> use (loop detection), but... it is there.

Loop detection is not the purpose of this header, but loop detection makes  
use of it, this is a nuanced distinction.

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=MN+B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----