Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto
Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]> Sat, 07 Aug 2021 06:35:23 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Francesco Gennai writes: > Following the discussion, I see that the delivery-to is currently used > (in many cases) to loop detection. > In such cases it could contain an email address, a token, etc.. > I suspect that at the top of the problems discussed here there is a > conflict in the header name (deliverd-to:), between the current use > and the draft. > I would say that "delivered-to:" is not the best name for the current > use (loop detection), but... it is there. Loop detection is not the purpose of this header, but loop detection makes use of it, this is a nuanced distinction. _______________________________________________ ietf-smtp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEMWrVnbBKLOeG9ifkazpiviedvyUFAmEOYesACgkQazpivied vyXzixAAjz06498EyZX49GOsA9ks5YtGzWmAzv/tttZqv1nqO6rWhuTNMyize6j0 MeTBdlt2rYAJoRga+aF4X2fcw6mv8E2Y5tV8SnoseXEq74nqrxIpImnrk5YHWenw 3N4gmEyCETM5pIEpF/clK7UyBXMWYFfFaQNB6ZCKNhjfsuYSt1z3k8JY1CLyo2fv fPLeefh9Vn6I7Cdg2saWNsSLBvA6EbJkD3MjWrIDTPgERHGwt8Jyvp+vBNwOrhGe LeBllWEOEAlbpU1AmV7yKYCiAsZ2GqSQ6QZpBPYxs6dVvwOiqBSDgY69yAw7lyf/ gWhZSepjlD9jrN+R4/QIPJZ9GZf4j5JDr/5F5vw6ohiWOf2UioB2uWs1rMgUAJvM ACA0i82HfBna9Dj87nHJg400Xb3BgzCNgekC/pW41QgvVyjP7iwMXopxaZR1/BcZ fge6dBV1gfc7hVzS/CFuWvViYg+kwsG38vyOyPOIjgQdhOWHQ8cGGdKNCd2J3DCI /3WZJC4SWycW6fXVR2fTt9wGPQ0kJAaOIT8AvlSJGioMYFL+jJuAwtc+wJ2mg2js oLnH1vBn2eLYf5Xah7ChX++TnzhePFzaLowg2OuP4E2y38PwYxIMWW4jRem6lFSm koycZA6CGOFog0rRD8a5UbcSv2ed3mULZEoxAPZNUJhy5UtIyBs= =MN+B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----