Re: Who should set the Sender: header field?
"Valdis Klētnieks" <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:15:50 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <183972.1639545350@turing-police> |
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:27:20 +0100, Alessandro Vesely said: > Of course, I meant only in case the user added multiple mailboxes to From:. > RFC 5322 requires that a Sender: field be there in such cases. I wonder how many of the 800 pound gorillas in the email world still allow multiple addresses in the From: field - any proposal for weird headers that get rejected by either Google or Microsoft (rather than silently ignored and passed along) is de facto DOA, no matter what the de jure status is. No, I'm not thrilled by this situation, but here we are anyhow. Which gets me wondering - what *other* "still officially legal but not usable except in small private conclaves" features are still out there? I know that nmh/exmh dropped message/partial support because nobody seems to be using it in the wild... _______________________________________________ ietf-smtp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 494 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJhuXoFAAoJEI0DS38y7CIcBqEH/A5TXSG6vsSGP43y4W+ePU5D yMLlpUVcdnLcmiHzbkeHRB1IO6eD9rybtNRY/94DWBqyuUetj4o2DjlLKSSImESt InOvyhjfjxdK6QXwYSTZtoRc4SoP+qa89Vhp50EtbJ80U3LxsVppbEV40lJ4KyYQ lihnop5N7UIiqXyJsGrBBjsnb85LKTiOrsw+pAB3cb9KBR4ggqyvAVbJ/KurxeQ8 U5VsA/cQNcAjElUmSOTef6QAIOnEKBuILyO9POz+4MTxGdJoyZ5CumON+RHA/Ps4 YDwkW0/6oyzS3Pbio6vKz1aem6PoNnDWxR7rWouetQdiVKnxrsBYiew883RUGmc= =SBPA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----