Re: Who should set the Sender: header field?

"Valdis KlÄ“tnieks" <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Dec 2021 00:15:50 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smtp
Message-ID <183972.1639545350@turing-police>
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:27:20 +0100, Alessandro Vesely said:

> Of course, I meant only in case the user added multiple mailboxes to From:.
> RFC 5322 requires that a Sender: field be there in such cases.

I wonder how many of the 800 pound gorillas in the email world still allow
multiple addresses in the From: field - any proposal for weird headers that get
rejected by either Google or Microsoft (rather than silently ignored and passed
along) is de facto DOA, no matter what the de jure status is.

No, I'm not thrilled by this situation, but here we are anyhow.

Which gets me wondering - what *other* "still officially legal but not usable
except in small private conclaves" features are still out there? I know
that nmh/exmh dropped message/partial support because nobody seems
to be using it in the wild...

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 494 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJhuXoFAAoJEI0DS38y7CIcBqEH/A5TXSG6vsSGP43y4W+ePU5D
yMLlpUVcdnLcmiHzbkeHRB1IO6eD9rybtNRY/94DWBqyuUetj4o2DjlLKSSImESt
InOvyhjfjxdK6QXwYSTZtoRc4SoP+qa89Vhp50EtbJ80U3LxsVppbEV40lJ4KyYQ
lihnop5N7UIiqXyJsGrBBjsnb85LKTiOrsw+pAB3cb9KBR4ggqyvAVbJ/KurxeQ8
U5VsA/cQNcAjElUmSOTef6QAIOnEKBuILyO9POz+4MTxGdJoyZ5CumON+RHA/Ps4
YDwkW0/6oyzS3Pbio6vKz1aem6PoNnDWxR7rWouetQdiVKnxrsBYiew883RUGmc=
=SBPA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----