Re: Validating MTA-STS setup, by writing to improperly configured MTA-STS sites
"Brotman, Alex" <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:50:06 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CH2PR11MB4342190E4B27AF5DD2027943F7509@CH2PR11MB4342.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> |
Could you simulate this by having your outbound not attempt STARTTLS (perhaps just to a specific host)? If your MTA code understands the difference between not-offered and not-attempted, that wouldn't work. Just a thought. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-smtp <[email protected]> On Behalf Of ????? ???????? > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 11:53 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ietf-smtp] Validating MTA-STS setup, by writing to improperly > configured MTA-STS sites > > Hello, > > I want to validate, that outgoing MTA-STS does work correctly. I want to > send an email to a site, which has broken MTA-STS, and see what happens. > > Can somebody name a sample site, which (on purpose, for testing purposes, > unintentionally for the moment) announces MTA-STS, but does not offer > STARTTLS? > > I found only > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mtasts.xyz/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!TTR4o6 > 1qatE9S6m9-9E3V266j07tny3GsF_Gb-Cme7r- > bqM2EnnrsBWVuvBYC0D3pGbE_raAtg$ trying to perform outbound tests, > but its MTA-STA setup is too broken - the certificates are outdated and the > HTTP-policy is thus ignored. > > Greetings > Дилян > > _______________________________________________ > ietf-smtp mailing list > [email protected] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf- > smtp__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!TTR4o61qatE9S6m9-9E3V266j07tny3GsF_Gb-Cme7r- > bqM2EnnrsBWVuvBYC0D3pGYo8Sdz-Q$ _______________________________________________ ietf-smtp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp