Re: [dispatch] Discussion about draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header
"Bron Gondwana" <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:41:34 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jan-Philipp, There will be others from that alliance at M3AAWG in San Francisco next month I'm fairly sure. It is the first in person meeting for a while, so I dunno. There are definitely people from 1&1 who have attended in the past, for example. I'm going to be attending M3AAWG, and am happy to chat with people. I definitely do recommend M3AAWG to you as a good place to network with other senders and also mailbox providers. You definitely should consider joining m3aawg before the mid-year meeting in London. https://www.m3aawg.org/upcoming-meetingsv2 says: 55th General Meeting June 13-16, 2022 London, England Park Plaza Riverbank London Cheers, Bron. On Sat, Jan 15, 2022, at 06:23, Jan-Philipp Benecke wrote: > Hey dispatch wg! > > First of all, I would like to introduce myself briefly: > My name is Jan-Philipp Benecke, i work as a Deliverability & Software > Engineer at CleverReach GmbH & Co.KG. > We're a email marketing provider offering a software-as-a-service for > sending email campaigns and transactional mails. > This is my first IETF related work, so i'm a newbie when coming to this :) > > I want to introduce you my email-related draft "Complaint Feedback Loop > Address Header" which can be found @ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header/. > The intention of this draft is to have documented, standardized and > automated way to provide a so called complaint feedback loop address to > mailbox providers. > Currently, providing and maintaining such an address is a manual and > time-consuming process for both sides, email senders and mailbox providers. > This draft defines the required header, how the header needs to be > processed and signed by DKIM. > > Now i want to kick off a discussion around the draft and collect > feedback. This draft has already been presented to the ISE, Adrian > advised me to introduce the draft to this wg for further review and > discussion. > > There has been already a heavy discussion while writing within the > Certified Senders Alliance (https://certified-senders.eu/), which is an > association of mailbox providers and senders. > The conclusion of this discussion was that a larger majority is > interested in such an automated path. > For example, 1&1 Mail & Media, the company behind web.de/gmx.de/mail.com > (major mailbox provider in Germany), is very interested in this draft > and would be happy to have this. > The same feedback i already got from some email senders i'm in contact with. > > I look forward to hear your feedback about this draft. > > Best, > Jan-Philipp > > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch > -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd [email protected] _______________________________________________ ietf-smtp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp