Re: Some RFC2142 adoption data
John C Klensin <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:18:11 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D16E25E86745D0576AFFF1B2@PSB> |
--On Friday, February 11, 2022 19:46 +0100 Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > The European Commission has published a comprehensive study on > DNS abuse: > > Study on Domain Name System (DNS) abuse, 2022 > https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/616244 > > Study on Domain Name System (DNS) abuse : technical report. > Appendix 1, 2022 > https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/473317 > > Chapter 18 of the Appendix (2nd link above) contains data on > role addresses. They also tested the RNAME address of SOA > records of 1M Tranco domains. I only attach the Venn diagram. One thing I find extremely interesting about this is that, independent of what RFC 2142 adds to the list, there has been one specific role address -- postmaster-- that has been _required_ since at least the time of RFCs 822 and 1123 and it apparently was not adopted heavily enough to make that chart. I have no idea what that means except that it leaves me a bit suspicious of the data and the means used to obtain it. john