Re: Updated draft for "SMTP Response for Detected Spam"
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:25:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[email protected]>, Claus Assmann <ietf- [email protected]> writes >Please don't use up all the 25x codes, >use the enhanced status code for this purpose. Since the receiver knows the message is spam I was wondering why the code was 259 rather than 559 ... ... also, the text mentions all sorts of terms of art like "spam folder" and "Email Service Provider" which I can't find in RFC5598 or defined in later sections (assuming that their meaning is relevant ?) - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBYkTKxt2nQQHFxEViEQL0xACgmbRpNqJIOqelWSvgnhJROU7KDMMAoI1f I0ShnluPglaJleEXm0Es4jBA =ZnvV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----