Re: Updated draft for "SMTP Response for Detected Spam"

Richard Clayton <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Mar 2022 22:25:26 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smtp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <[email protected]>, Claus Assmann <ietf-
[email protected]> writes

>Please don't use up all the 25x codes,
>use the enhanced status code for this purpose.

Since the receiver knows the message is spam I was wondering why the
code was 259 rather than 559 ...

... also, the text mentions all sorts of terms of art like "spam folder"
and "Email Service Provider" which I can't find in RFC5598 or defined in
later sections (assuming that their meaning is relevant ?)

- -- 
richard                                                   Richard Clayton

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBYkTKxt2nQQHFxEViEQL0xACgmbRpNqJIOqelWSvgnhJROU7KDMMAoI1f
I0ShnluPglaJleEXm0Es4jBA
=ZnvV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----