RE: AD review of: draft-ietf-snmpconf-diffpolicy-07.txt
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:34:07 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550245C487@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
> > > s/SMI/SNMP/, cause the SMI does not limit it, it is the SNMP PDU > > that does not allow for more than 128 subids in an OID in a > > varBind. I should have seen this last time. > > hello all > > it might be wise to consult rfc 2578, section 3.5, page 15, > 2nd sentence, while contemplating this change > Mmm,,, very good, thanks for the ptr Jeff. We had been using SNMP protocol as the culprit up till now I think (see RFC3416, sect 4.1, top of page 10). Seems we have it limited both at the SMI and at the SNMP Protocol level. So that means I can live with both SMI and/or SNMP. Bert > regards, > jdc >