Re: snmpconf advancement
Mark Ellison <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Jun 2002 06:31:22 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpconf |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ellison Software Consulting, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I've been involved with SNMP implementations since 1990 and have also been actively involved with SNMP related working groups of the IETF. When discussing SNMP implementation approaches with developers, I have cited the BCP produced by this working group. Many have found the information contained in the BCP memo highly useful when developing the SNMP agent component of their products. In reviewing the PM memo it is clear to me this approach is valid and useful within both the MLM/dual entity role and within the "higher end" embedded environment. I do have two considerations: (1) The methods in the PM memo build upon the current Internet Standard Management Framework There is a MIB contained in the PM memo, not a PIB, so I don't understand why the recent IESG treatment of PIBs applies here. (2) RFC 2026 sxn 10.3.2. specifies how the IESG treats intellectual property rights applicable to standards track documents. I found no specification on how the IESG treats IPR applicable to an informational document. Considerations notwithstanding, I believe the PM memo should be considered for a status of Proposed Standard. Regards, Mark Ellison Ellison Software Consulting, Inc. http://www.scguild.com/Resumes/1321R.html