RE: snmpconf "bcp" Version 11 published
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:41:44 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15583DB27@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
> The references are in the document in the references section. yes > Am I missing something? I think we are just quibbling about the title of > the section, are we not? We're talking about splitting the list of references into two. The first part are then titled "Normative references" The second part are titled "Informative References" see: http://www.rfc-editor.org/policy.html, specifically under References Section discussion Wayne, pls post your list of the suggested split, so we can check. Wayne, it would also be much better to change the references to the SNMP documents to the new RFC341x range. We have also more or less agreed on a new new MIB boilerplate that you may want to check.... http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-boilerplate.html although right at this moment I seem unable to access myself. Bert > > /jon > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jon Saperia [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: donderdag 2 januari 2003 15:16 > > > To: [email protected]; Randy Bush; Wayne F. Tackabury > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: snmpconf "bcp" Version 11 published > > > > > > On Monday 30 December 2002 10:27 pm, Randy Bush wrote: > > > > > -- The "references" section is now called "Informative > > > > > References". This is consistent with the notion that > this is to > > > > > be an Informational RFC, and has no particular > pronouncements on > > > > > its own. > > > > > > > > uh, to be precise, any of the references which MUST be read to > > > > understand this document are normative, not informational. > > > > > > > > randy > > > > > > Do you have a specific suggestion for changing the title of > > > the section? > > > If not, we can leave it alone or change back to just > > > 'references' as in > > > previous draft which I assume could be done by the RFC > editor if you > > > wanted. > > > > > > /jon > > > -- > > > Jon Saperia > > > > > > [email protected] > > > Phone: 978-461-0249 > > > Fax: 617-249-0874 > > > http://www.jdscons.com/ > > -- > Jon Saperia > > [email protected] > Phone: 978-461-0249 > Fax: 617-249-0874 > http://www.jdscons.com/ >