Re: snmpconf Persistence definition
"Wayne F. Tackabury" <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Jan 2003 15:41:44 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 12:50 PM 1/9/2003 -0700, Eduardo Cardona wrote: >MIB persistence (also from 3.7 cases description) I guess is more like >if a value was changed/added and must be keep, then the object persist, >but haven't find any good reference/glossary term about persistent in >RFCs While it doesn't even use the term "persistence", the DESCRIPTION clause for the StorageType TC describes the concept in somewhat classic terms. While it refers to "what is in RAM"/"what is in ROM", the modern terms I hear are more of the running and/or restart values for a configurable item. This doesn't answer your main question. When writing the BCP, we didn't particularly feel like defining this was in scope. We had a glossary at one point which some people liked and which might have even had this term in it (I can't recall), but others felt as though it was too controversial for us to be trying to define terms like this, and if it didn't conflict with RFC's like the Policy Terminology RFC, could drift apart from it as each document underwent revisions. Regards, Wayne