Re: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?

Randy Presuhn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.snmpv3
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi -

> From: Michael Thomas <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 17:08:25 -0800 (PST)
> To: Wes Hardaker <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michael Thomas <[email protected]>, [email protected],
>         "Harrington, David" <[email protected]>,
>         "Chris Elliott" <[email protected]>,
>         "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>,
>         "[email protected] (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> References: <6D745637A7E0F94DA070743C55CDA9BA256F06@NHROCMBX1.ets.enterasys.com>
> 	<[email protected]>
> 	<[email protected]>
> 	<[email protected]>
...
>    I'm not saying that IPsec would be a good fit;
>    quite the opposite, actually. I'm arguing that app
>    layer security without key management is, well,
>    useless was the first thing that popped into my
>    mind, but I should probably be more charitable.
>    It really makes deciding what to do at any sort
>    of scale *very* hard given the inferior choices.
> 
>    As I said, for MIDCOM this is a very distinct
>    negative for SNMPv3 as a choice, all other
>    things being equal. Any other wg considering 
>    SNMPv3 as the basis for their protocol would be
>    well advised to take that into consideration.
...

Could you give an example of a protocol in use that does
initial key distribution, key update, authentication and access
control management well?  (All four, not just one or two.)
With SNMPv3 USM+VACM, we get three out of the four.  If there
were a good way to get all four, I think the WG would like
to know about it.

 ------------------------------------------------------
 Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  SJC-1.3141
 [email protected]  2141 North First Street
 Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San José, California 95131  USA
 ------------------------------------------------------
 My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
 ------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.