Re: WG last call: Coex draft

I am willing to check for grammar and spelling.  Any time left over, I
will look at the RFC editor issues (but I find the language of those
guidelines somewhat opaque).

Tom Petch
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Harrington, David <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] (E-mail) <[email protected]>
Date: 23 December 2002 20:24
Subject: WG last call: Coex draft


>Hi,
>
>I am looking for two volunteers to review the coex draft for
non-technical stuff.
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-snmpv3-coex-v2-02.txt
>
>One volunteer should check it thoroughly against RFC2223, and
http://www.rfc-editor.org/policy.html, and
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt, and
http://www.ietf.org/ID-nits.html. There should be lots of overlap in
these documents (and hopefully little contradiction) so it not as
large a job as it might appear. Doing this review would be good for
any current ot future document editors, giving you good training in
how to write IETF documents in the preferred formats and organization.
I am willing to have multiple volunteers check the document against a
subset of these documents.
>
>One volunteer should check the language for good grammar and
spelling. This will require more than running it through "spell" or
MS-Word's spelling and grammar checkers.
>
>We so far have had one person review the document for smilint
cleanliness. Mike, did you review the document against "Guidelines for
MIB Authors and Reviewers" in the process?
>
>We need more technical review of this document. If you review the
document (reasonably thoroughly) and find nothing to object to, please
post a comment to the mailing list stating that you have done such a
review.
>
>Any volunteers?
>
>Thanks,
>dbh
>---
>David Harrington
>[email protected]
>co-chair, IETF SNMPv3 WG
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Harrington, David
>Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:08 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: Russ Mundy (E-mail); Randy Bush (E-mail)
>Subject: WG last call: Coex draft
>
>
>Hi,
>
>The WG chairs are starting a WG last call on
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-snmpv3-coex-v2-02.txt,
a new revision of the coexistence document.
>
>The last call starts now and completes on January 10th, which permits
extra time for the holiday season.
>
>Thank you,
>dbh
>
>David Harrington
>[email protected]
>co-chair, IETF SNMPv3 WG
>
>
>> Title : Coexistence between Version 1,
>> Version 2, and Version
>>                           3 of the Internet-standard Network
>> Management
>>                           Framework
>> To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message
to
>> ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body
>> of the message.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login
>> with the username
>> "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging
in,
>> type "cd internet-drafts" and then
>> "get draft-ietf-snmpv3-coex-v2-02.txt".
>>
>> A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
>> http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.
>>
>> Send a message to:
>> [email protected].
>> In the body type:
>> "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-snmpv3-coex-v2-02.txt".
>>
>> NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
>> MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
>> feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
>> command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
>> a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant
>> mail readers
>> exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
>> "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
>> up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
>> how to manipulate these messages.
>>
>>
>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
>> Internet-Draft.
>>