Re: About Agent-Manager implementation.

Randy Presuhn <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:37:10 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.snmpv3
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi -

> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 02:32:22 +0530
> From: parasuraman <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: About Agent-Manager implementation.
...
> my assumption about this question is as follows:
> It can run anyway and it is implementation specific. That is, the
> Command
> Generator and Command responder applications can share a same dispatcher
> 
> or a different one.
> 
> Is my assumption correct or wrong ? Please clarify me.
...

The configuration you describe sounds rather like a typical
"disman" environment.  There you'd really want to use a single
SNMP engine per box to support both the command generator and
command responder applications, just to keep the management
of security tractible.

(Even in a non-disman environment, think about how you'd
manage the keys for the CG side of things.  You'll end up
having to have a CR on each of those engines anyway just to
handle configuration of security.  Introducing additional
SNMP engines would only makes things more complicated.)

 ------------------------------------------------------
 Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  SJC-1.3141
 [email protected]  2141 North First Street
 Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San José, California 95131  USA
 ------------------------------------------------------
 My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
 ------------------------------------------------------