Re: About Agent-Manager implementation.
Randy Presuhn <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:37:10 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi - > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 02:32:22 +0530 > From: parasuraman <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: About Agent-Manager implementation. ... > my assumption about this question is as follows: > It can run anyway and it is implementation specific. That is, the > Command > Generator and Command responder applications can share a same dispatcher > > or a different one. > > Is my assumption correct or wrong ? Please clarify me. ... The configuration you describe sounds rather like a typical "disman" environment. There you'd really want to use a single SNMP engine per box to support both the command generator and command responder applications, just to keep the management of security tractible. (Even in a non-disman environment, think about how you'd manage the keys for the CG side of things. You'll end up having to have a CR on each of those engines anyway just to handle configuration of security. Introducing additional SNMP engines would only makes things more complicated.) ------------------------------------------------------ Randy Presuhn BMC Software, Inc. SJC-1.3141 [email protected] 2141 North First Street Tel: +1 408 546-1006 San José, California 95131 USA ------------------------------------------------------ My opinions and BMC's are independent variables. ------------------------------------------------------