Re: coex draft last call

Hi -

> From: "Dave Shield" <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected] (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:08 AM
> Subject: Re: coex draft last call
...
>    One final issue:
> Is it worth saying something about AgentX in all this?  The AgentX
> protocol operations are essentially SNMPv2 in a different guise,
> so an AgentX master agent could be viewed as a sort of proxy.
> Is it worthing saying something along these lines?
>    Or is it really too late to consider this properly?
...

I concur with Dave Harrington's comment that this document should
not refer to AgentX, but would note that the AgentX specification
*does* refer to this document, since some of the rules here can
be "reused" in figuring out how, for example, an AgentX environment
could support SNMPv1.

Randy