Re: snmpEngineBoots
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Mon, 5 May 2003 16:55:48 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001501c31361$d9e7abe0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Ann Lo" <[email protected]> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 4:13 PM > Subject: Re: snmpEngineBoots ... > Interpretation of snmpEngineBoots in this way appears fine. But then, shouldn't > msgAuthoriativeEngineBoots start from 1 instead of 0? > > Presently rfc3414 (USM) says > UsmSecurityParameters ::= > ... > msgAuthoritativeEngineBoots INTEGER (0..2147483647), > msgAuthoritativeEngineTime INTEGER (0..2147483647), ... Section 3.1 (6) (c) describes the special case when zero appears in this protocol field. Randy