Re: context name for sending out the trap/inform.
"David T. Perkins" <[email protected]> Thu, 22 May 2003 15:02:12 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
HI, Management information exists in one (and possibly additional) contexts. A notification generator must "know" this, as well as "know" the reason for the notification and the object instances to include in an object instance. All of that is independent from the authorization rules. Conceptually, a generator puts together a PDU with engineID and context string and hands it to the notification distribution system which does filtering and management target selection. Note that the description of the notification distribution system is quite complex and difficult to understand in the RFCs. At 01:39 PM 5/22/2003 -0700, Daniel Chuang wrote: >Hi, everyone, > > I apologize if this question has been asked before. > >In RFC 3413: > >sec 3.3. Notification Originator Applications > >When a notification originator wishes to generate a notification, it > must first determine in which context the information to be conveyed > in the notification exists, i.e., it must determine the > contextEngineID and contextName. ..... > >Then, >Is there any standard way to specify the context name for sending out >the notification since notify view is determined by context name prefix >or this is totally implementation dependent ? > >Thanks for clarification. > >Daniel Regards, /david t. perkins