RE: SNMPv3 security
Michael Kirkham <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Fleischman, Eric wrote: > It is therefore essential that the Session Key have a short lifetime in > order to reduce the amount of available ciphertext encrypted by the same > key and to introduce doubts whether any two ciphertexts were encrypted > by the same or different keys. This is the most fundamental defense > available to us as SNMPv3 end users. Not to argue either way, but are you taking into account the fact that each message is encrypted using a different initialization vector (derived from the static localized key and a salt that changes with each message)? (RFC 3414 section 8.1.1.1 for reference.) -- Michael Kirkham www.muonics.com