Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hardaker-snmp-session-sm-00.txt

>>>>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 09:08:13 -0400, "Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> said:

Sharon> Might I suggest then that providing a MIB way of doing the
Sharon> same thing might just be noise? As for more detailed
Sharon> configuration, why can't this be done in the protocol? A
Sharon> monitoring MIB would be useful though if you can keep it nice
Sharon> and simple - i.e. no superfluous configuration.

Because the complexity of the protocol would get pretty nasty.  We
already *have* a management protocol and it doesn't make much sense
not to use it to self-manage ;-)

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta