Re: [Isms] Why SNMPv3? [WG Review: Integrated Security Model for SNMP (isms)]
Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:23:14 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sparta |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:51:24 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola <[email protected]> said: Pekka> .. then the justification for SNMPv3's increased security Pekka> features would indeed be higher. But few folks do SNMP writes, Pekka> and many don't bother providing SNMP access to untrusted Pekka> parties, so the features may not be all that interesting. You fall right into one category of users, I agree. Your situation is likely even common. However, its not the only case. If you look at the proceeding slides from the last ISMS BOF you'll see that the variation in who is using SNMP, what versions they're using, how they're using it and what they want from it don't boil down to a single case. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta