Re: [Isms] Why SNMPv3? [WG Review: Integrated Security Model for SNMP (isms)]

Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:23:14 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.snmpv3
Organization Sparta
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:51:24 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola <[email protected]> said:

Pekka> .. then the justification for SNMPv3's increased security
Pekka> features would indeed be higher.  But few folks do SNMP writes,
Pekka> and many don't bother providing SNMP access to untrusted
Pekka> parties, so the features may not be all that interesting.

You fall right into one category of users, I agree.  Your situation is
likely even common.  However, its not the only case.  If you look at
the proceeding slides from the last ISMS BOF you'll see that the
variation in who is using SNMP, what versions they're using, how
they're using it and what they want from it don't boil down to a
single case.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta