Re: Update to Submit RFC

Chris Newman <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:47:29 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.submit
Message-ID <2147483647.1061297249@[10.0.1.3]>
begin  quotation by Dave Crocker on 2003/8/19 12:08 -0700:
> However, what is missing is a clear statement of the problems that are
> being solved.  We can debate the solution details after we are clear
> about the goals.

Dave,

The problems I want to solve with a revision of the submit RFC are:

1. making the timeouts rational.

2. correcting the authentication references in Submit now the relevant
   SMTP AUTH and STARTTLS RFCs are published and we have operational experience.

I was asking if other people had other problems they wanted to address in a
revision of the submit RFC.

Now you seem to have some questions about the need for a submit protocol.  That
question is answered in the already published submit RFC, and is a distraction
from the technical discussion I have started.  However, additions to the
justification section in the present submit RFC would be in order.

                - Chris