Re: Update to Submit RFC
Chris Newman <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:47:29 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.submit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2147483647.1061297249@[10.0.1.3]> |
begin quotation by Dave Crocker on 2003/8/19 12:08 -0700:
> However, what is missing is a clear statement of the problems that are
> being solved. We can debate the solution details after we are clear
> about the goals.
Dave,
The problems I want to solve with a revision of the submit RFC are:
1. making the timeouts rational.
2. correcting the authentication references in Submit now the relevant
SMTP AUTH and STARTTLS RFCs are published and we have operational experience.
I was asking if other people had other problems they wanted to address in a
revision of the submit RFC.
Now you seem to have some questions about the need for a submit protocol. That
question is answered in the already published submit RFC, and is a distraction
from the technical discussion I have started. However, additions to the
justification section in the present submit RFC would be in order.
- Chris