Re: Please review draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls

Looks ok.

Some editorial suggestions

a} /SubjectAltName field/subjectAltName extension/ twice

b} /ipAddress/iPAddress/ once

c} PKI; expand the acronym on first use

d} s5.1 need only refer to 4.2.2 not 4.2.1

e}  " SerialNumber portion of the Subject Distinguished Name"
I do not know what this; serialNumber of type X520SerialNumber?

f} s5.5 should reference 5.3 and 5.4 not 5.2

g} s7.1, cross reference to s4.1 for the port number definition

h} Should we add a reference for SHA-1?  I would not bother for a pkix document,
but for one aimed at network management, I think we should.  [RFC 3174]

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Lonvick" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:46 PM
Subject: [Syslog] Please review draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls


> Hi Folks,
>
> We're getting very close on this.  Can we get some people to look it over
> and let us know what you think?
>
> If you look it over and agree with the changes, we need some "I'm OK with
> this" and "me too" responses.  :-)
>
> For your convenience, the IETF tools people have provided a way to easily
> see the diffs from the last version here:
>    http://tools.ietf.org/wg/syslog/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls/
>
> Thanks,
> Chris & David
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog