Re: Use of system port vs. regular port

"tom.petch" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.syslog
Message-ID <000801c8fd14$1e06e240$0601a8c0@allison>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 6:08 PM
Subject: [Syslog] Use of system port vs. regular port


> Lars Eggert has entered a DISCUSS on draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls
> asking 
> 
> "What is the justification for allocating a system port? Why wouldn't a
> registered port suffice?
> (Note that IANA is changing procedures such that system ports are
> becoming more difficult to obtain, because we're running out of them.)"
> 
> Is there a reason why we require a system port?  Was this discussed
> previously?  Would a registered port be acceptable? 
> 
See

[Syslog] Other syslog-tls Issues---Issue0
20 March 2006

This was then incorporated in 

draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-02.txt

Tom Petch

> Thanks,
> 
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.