Re: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls (fwd)

Hi Tom,

I forgot to mention about draft-hodges-server-ident-check.  It may be 
accessed here:
   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hodges-server-ident-check-00
(I'm guessing that you already found that so I'm sending this along to 
those who want to take a look.) Chris Newman is working with the authors 
to get it revised and back in the system.  You can send a note to him 
saying that it lacks a discussion forum.

We will NOT be referencing this document as it has expired.  I'll let Joe 
see about cutting good text and pasting it into the syslog/tls document to 
address Chris Newman's DISCUSS.

Thanks,
Chris

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, tom.petch wrote:

> I note that
> draft-hodges-server-ident-check
> to which we are invited to contribute and from which we are invited to copy is
> A) expird
> B) gives no indication of where it might be discussed; the only thing I am sure
> of is that it won't be the TLS list since they have refused to take on such
> work - sigh.
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Lonvick" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 4:05 PM
> Subject: [Syslog] ID Tracker State Update Notice:
> draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls (fwd)
>
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: The IESG <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls
>>
>> 'State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by
> Cindy Morgan'
>> ID Tracker URL:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=14551&rf
> c_flag=0
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>
>> It looks like the telechat is over and we have some DISCUSSes and COMMENTs
>> to clear before the document becomes an RFC.  The real meat is here:
>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2334/
>>
>> We've already cleared the issue about a system port v. a registered port.
>> (The IESG is now debating the distinction between system and registered
>> ports but that's clearly outside of our discussion in this WG.)
>>
>> We can easily clear Tim Polk's COMMENT
>>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls/comment/8
> 4805/?
>> (I've reviewed and agree and would like a second on this.)
>>
>> Joe is looking at the other issues raised by Chris Newman.
>>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls/comment/8
> 4852/?
>> He'll likely have some answers early next week.  Please provide input on
>> this to the list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> Syslog mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
>
>
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog