syslog WG meeting minutes (proposed)
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.syslog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Folks, Here are the meeting minutes that I took. Please send back edits if you want anything changed. === Meeting was started, blue sheets passed around, no one in jabber room other than the people in the room. Chairs went through the slides. Q about syslog/BEEP on slide 10: We're not proposing to standardize this; it's already RFC 3195. Since the uptake on implementation (of this RFC, and of BEEP overall) is low, then the WG should consider moving the RFC to HISTORIC. Jurgen S. gave a review of his thoughts on the proposed new charter items: Slide 8, MIB, OK DHCP, has some operational value don't need an architectural reference to be done in the IETF Slide 9 might be interesting to have a guideline but not sure who would commit the time to do that DTLS, should be done and aligned with RFC 5425 (syslog/tls) syslog/tcp, should be very straightforward and easy to do syslog/BEEP, declare HISTORIC Dan R. - Since syslog WG is proposing to do syslog/DTLS is there enough commonality so that ISMS/DTLS and IPFIX/DTLS can re-use? - Consensus was that this was likely. David also noted that the others are also doing SCTP. Pasi E. - syslog/DTLS should be easy since it will draw directly from syslog/TLS. - IPFIX also working on Dead Peer Detection (DTLS Heartbeet), we should likely support this as well. - There were problems with the previous IPFIX/DTLS but that was because of bad libraries in OpenSSL which have since been fixed. Wes H. - there is not that much commonality between the schemes because of a lot of useage details. Chris and David have asked Joe Saloway to act as WG editor for the DTLS work. Meeting adjurned at 10am. === Thanks, Chris _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog