Re: Matters arising was: Re: syslog WG meeting minutes(proposed)
Gerhard Muenz <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:31:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.syslog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, It seems that syslog is struggling with issues IPFIX has already gone through. It might be worth looking at RFC5101 and the wording in Section 10.3 about IPFIX-over-UDP: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5101#section-10.3.1 Regards, Gerhard > > Hi, > > To clarify a point ... > syslog/tls is not simply RECOMMENDED; it is MANDATORY TO IMPLEMENT. > > syslog/dtls will be an optional transport; we do not need to RECOMMEND > it. > Implementers can decide for themselves whether to implement it. > I agree that the IESG may not approve it with congestion control > considerations. > > dbh > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.4 KB) - not displayed