nits on draft-ietf-syslog-dtls-02
Sean Turner <[email protected]> Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:54:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.syslog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Here are some comments on draft-ietf-syslog-dtls-02. All are nits. 1. Introduction: r/with TLS security [RFC5246]/with TLS [RFC5246] r/syslog Message/syslog message Upon first reading of the last paragraph, I was trying to figure out how I was going to use syslog/DTLS/UDP/DCCP. Can we use "in preference to" for "over" in the last sentence (or something other than "over"): OLD: If an operator has the choice of the two, it is recommended to use syslog over DTLS over DCCP. NEW: If an operator has the choice of the two, it is RECOMMENDED to use syslog over DTLS in preference to syslog over DCCP. 2. Terminology To align with the DTLS client definition: OLD: A "DTLS server" is an application that can receive a Client Hello from a client and reply with a Server Hello. NEW: A "DTLS server" is an application that can receive a DTLS Client Hello from a client and reply with a DTLS Server Hello. 4. Using DTLS to Secure Syslog r/Denial of Service attacks/Denial of Service attacks. 5.4.1 Message Size r/each DTLS record must fit within a single DTLS datagram/each DTLS record MUST fit within a single DTLS datagram spt _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog