Re: New Version: draft-ietf-syslog-dtls-02

Hi,

I want to thank everyone who provided WGLC reviews and comments.  These 
help a lot to keep this process going.  (..and we got our draft in before 
the cutoff date. :)

I've looked over these changes and feel that they address the WGLC 
comments that were received.  I'd appreciate it if the people who did the 
reviews would also do a check.  As everyone has noticed, this document is 
closely following RFC 5425 and I'd like to keep that format.

David has written up a preliminary shepherding document.  I'll edit that 
and send a copy around to the WG before submitting it to the IESG sometime 
next week.

Many thanks,
Chris

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote:

> I just submitted draft -02 of draft-ietf-syslog-dtls.  Thanks to all the
> folks that submitted comments on the draft, I think I have incorporated
> them into the latest revision.  Here is a summary of the changes:
>
> 1. Reworked the introduction with helpful suggestions from Chris
> Lonvick.
> 2. Removed the definition of connection and made sure when the term is
> used it refers to a "DTLS connection"
> 3. Cleaned up text about security requirements
> 4. Cleaned up text in section 5.1
> 5. Removed some extraneous text from section 5.3
> 6. Added certificate fingerprint as an example of what can be stored to
> help correlate identity with sent and received data.
> 7. Fixed text on message size
> 8. Removed section on "Cryptographic level" because it was confusing and
> did not add anything.
> 9. Changed SYSLOG and Syslog to syslog where appropriate.
>
> I think the draft is ready to go to the IESG.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> Syslog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
>
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog