Re: New Version: draft-ietf-syslog-dtls-02
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> Sun, 7 Mar 2010 07:03:15 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.syslog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Rich,
Yeah; we got a little overzealous on that. Let's try this:
Transmission of syslog Messages over UDP [RFC5426] defines how to
provide unreliable, non-secure datagram transport for syslog. This
transport should only be used as described in Section 4.3 of [RFC5426].
Thanks,
Chris
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Richard Graveman wrote:
> Chis,
>
>> I've looked over these changes and feel that they address the WGLC comments
>> that were received.
>
> I strongly disagree on several counts. First, the new document says:
>
> Transmission of syslog Messages over UDP [RFC5426] defines how to
> provide unreliable, non-secure datagram transport for syslog. This
> transport is NOT RECOMMENDED.
>
> NOT RECOMMENDED means SHOULD NOT implement. SHOULD NOT implement means
> DEPRECATED. There was no WG discussion of deprecating RFC 5426.
>
> In fact, in some cases, protocol security may not be needed, for a
> variety of reasons. In other cases, security may already be provided
> by, say, IPsec, required in IPv6.
>
> Saying that the work completed just last year is deprecated without
> any WG discussion is absurd.
>
> Rich Graveman
>
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog