Re: New Version: draft-ietf-syslog-dtls-02

Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> Sun, 7 Mar 2010 07:03:15 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.syslog
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Rich,

Yeah; we got a little overzealous on that.  Let's try this:

    Transmission of syslog Messages over UDP [RFC5426] defines how to
    provide unreliable, non-secure datagram transport for syslog.  This
    transport should only be used as described in Section 4.3 of [RFC5426].

Thanks,
Chris

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Richard Graveman wrote:

> Chis,
>
>> I've looked over these changes and feel that they address the WGLC comments
>> that were received.
>
> I strongly disagree on several counts. First, the new document says:
>
>   Transmission of syslog Messages over UDP [RFC5426] defines how to
>   provide unreliable, non-secure datagram transport for syslog.  This
>   transport is NOT RECOMMENDED.
>
> NOT RECOMMENDED means SHOULD NOT implement. SHOULD NOT implement means
> DEPRECATED. There was no WG discussion of deprecating RFC 5426.
>
> In fact, in some cases, protocol security may not be needed, for a
> variety of reasons. In other cases, security may already be provided
> by, say, IPsec, required in IPv6.
>
> Saying that the work completed just last year is deprecated without
> any WG discussion is absurd.
>
> Rich Graveman
>
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog