Re: Review comments on draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-01.txt
Chris Lonvick <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:52:45 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.syslog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Tom, I got all excited about the next version of draft-ietf-syslog-dtls getting in before the cutoff time that I went ahead and edited plain-tcp. :-) Comments in-line. On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, tom.petch wrote: > Review comments on tcp-01 (as the subject line says:-) > > What is the intended status? The I-D does not say; I would aim for Standards > Track. CML> Yup. Now it says Standards Track. > > s.3 > "Traditional TCP implementations do not use any backchannel mechanism " > suggest > "Traditional implementations of syslog over TCP do not use any backchannel > mechanism " CML> Sounds good. > > "abilities of TCP" > suggest > "capabilities of TCP" CML> Good. > > s3.3 > I think that the ABNF rules should be amended so that the rule with > = > comes before the rule with > =/ CML> Makes sense. > > Add at the end > > " SYSLOG-MSG is defined in the syslog protocol [RFC5424]." CML> Added. > > A.2 > %d10 is LF not NL; I do not know which you mean. CML> I've seen it called both. I'm trying to track down a normative reference. Do you have one? Till then, I'm going to leave it as NL (%d10). [Pending review by Rainer.] > > And, perhaps the most important, somewhere I think you should cover the nature > of TCP; give it a message and it will buffer it, may be for days, and then lose > it because the connection is taken down. Should you recommend the use of PSH > for all messages? CML> I added a paragraph near the end of the Introduction about that. (Which I have not run by Rainer yet. :) Let me know if that's what you were thinking about. CML> We appreciate the review. The updated draft should be out soon and I'll ask for another review of it rsn. Thanks, Chris > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Lonvick" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 7:24 PM > Subject: [Syslog] Review comments on draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-01.txt > > >> Hi Folks, >> > > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog