Re: New syslog/tcp draft available

Chris,

I am sympathetic to not wanting to get stuck waiting for a reference.  I 
think the informative reference you cite would past muster.

spt

On 1/31/11 9:48 PM, Chris Lonvick wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> I've seen that but I don't want this document to sit idle for the next
> couple of years while that matures and becomes a normative and stable
> reference via becoming an RFC.
>
> I'm really thinking that putting in definitive references for transport
> layer vulnerabilities is going a bit beyond what is expected of an
> INFORMATIONAL document. That being said, I think it's a good idea and am
> willing to pursue it within reason.
>
> Gont's document does reference a paper by Steve Bellovin:
> Bellovin, S. M. 1989. Security Problems in the TCP/IP Protocol
> Suite. Computer Communication Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 32-48.
> That may be found here:
> http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=378449
>
> What would you think about referencing that document as an INFORMATIVE
> reference in the third subsection of the Security Considerations section?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Sean Turner wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but have you checked out:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security/
>>
>> spt
>>
>>
>> On 1/30/11 12:01 PM, Chris Lonvick wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> We've finally gotten around to revising draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp.
>>> : -)
>>>
>>> This addresses the issues that Tom raised about
>>> - the intro specifically stating what to expect in the body of the text
>>> - a note on the transport security.
>>>
>>> For the first, we just sort'a straightened things out with a few edits.
>>> For the latter, I looked in many places for a list of TCP
>>> vulnerabilities but couldn't find anything substantial. The US-CERT had
>>> a few implementation things and there were a scattering of other things.
>>> In the end, I just added a subsection to warn impelemters to look
>>> closely before writing code. If anyone has any other suggestions, please
>>> let us know.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Syslog mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog